Tuesday, August 29, 2006

Throwdown! Bobby Flay jumps the shark

Maybe this critique is unfair. Maybe I should wait for all the episodes of the show to air but at this point I feel secure in making the following statement: Throwdown! is the biggest mistake of Bobby Flay's television career. Why, because in it he comes off as a smug, arrogant bully.


Let’s back up for a minute. The premise for the show is that someone who is a great cook with one specialty, say barbeque, is invited by the Food Network staff to audition for their own show, or to be profiled on an existing show, or some such rouse that allows for the presence of the Food TV camera people without arousing suspicion. The cook invites a large group of friends and prepares to serve his/her specialty when, from out of nowhere, Bobby Flay shows up in a black SUV and throws down the gauntlet. A cook-off ensues and some “judges” are brought out to determine the winner.

What’s wrong with this? After all, Bobby shows up on the other cook’s turf and prepares the other cook’s specialty to be tasted by a crowd that is biased towards the other cook. Plus, the other cook gets to be featured on national television. Sometimes, there is nothing wrong with it at all. Sometimes the other cook has enough moxie to stand up to the NY Times 3 star (Bollo) and 2 star (Mesa Grill) chef and talk enough trash to make the whole thing fun.

The problem comes when the other cook is intimidated by Bobby Flay. I have seen two episodes of the show where this was obviously the case. The first was chowder expert Ben Sargeant who hosted a party in Brooklyn. The panic that washed over his face when Bobby got out of the SUV was obvious. Then when “judge” Rebecca Charles of Pearl Oyster Bar picked Bobby’s chowder I just felt really bad for the guy.

Worse was when Bobby took on wedding cake designer Michelle Doll. At the beginning of the show Bobby admitted to having never baked a wedding cake. Yet, there he was at Tavern on the Green, wheeling in a cake that he predicted would taste so much better than his opponent’s that he could overcome his obvious lack of skill in the cake decorating department. Ms. Doll came off as meek and even though she won the contest I still felt bad that she’d been put through the process. Did the fact that Bobby was a wedding cake making novice make for a unique challenge or raise the question of what kind of a jerk would think he could out-do someone at their specialty with only one try?

Throw down comes on the heels of the popularity of Iron Chef and its little sister Iron Chef America but those shows have an element of fun to them. The sides are evenly matched and the show, at least the Japanese version, sometimes seems to have a predetermined outcome. Who cares who wins when one professional chef bests another, anyway? It’s the look on the face of these contestants and the cock-sure attitude of the star that make Throwdown such a turnoff.

7 Comments:

At 1:39 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree about the intimidation and ego factor at work in this show. A more balanced concept would have the amateurs willingly submit themselves to a contest to prove their worthiness. This still preserves Flay's celebrity chef status but allows the possibility that he is only human and not a master of all specialties. Judges should be unbiased as well (no fellow star chefs!), maybe someone like Frank Bruni or Tim Zagat.

 
At 9:45 PM, Blogger dbrociner said...

Anonymous, interesting ideas. I like Bobby Flay even if this piece makes it seem otherwise. I just think he comes off looking like a bully here. The judging on the show is ridiculous, on the "jerk chicken" throwdown they pull a kid out of the crowd who looks like he could have been a stand in on that Napoleon Dynamite movie and ask him to cast the decisive vote. Now there's someone whose opinion I'm really going to respect.

Throwdown is a vehicle that Bobby Flay should have had better sense than to get involved with. The guy's in danger of being over exposed anyway, did he need to do a show that makes him look bad?

 
At 8:25 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Flay could have done worse: do you remember Rocco DiSpirito's "The Restaurant" ... ?

 
At 11:06 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The intimidation factor is unavoidable because of the premise of the show. I think Flay bends over backward to try to keep things light and to try not to intimidate, but it's difficult under the circumstances. Flay is actually at an advantage, despite taking on the specialists. He knows there will be a throwdown, and he prepares for it with two other chefs and the best ingredients. He won the chowder contest because he used lobster (his opponent's secrect ingredient was eel); he won the burger contest because his opponent was out on the fringe with a greek burger (it won a Build a Better Burger contest, most likely because it was "different") and he made a Cubano, putting ham on the burger and using a tasty mustard.
I've liked the show, and, yes, I sometimes feel bad for the "hoodwinked" contestants. But it's a tribute to them when they can take on and beat an accomplished chef, especially the hobbyists. Of the shows I've seen, he beat two people, the chowder guy and the burger woman, tied one, and lost the others. If I felt the judges were in on it, were somehow favoring the contestants, I wouldn't watch.

~ E.E.S.

 
At 5:37 PM, Blogger dbrociner said...

E.E.S., thanks for coming up with the term "hobbyist" for some of the contestants on this show, I think its exactly the right word. I'm not sure about Bobby Flay bending over backwards not to intimidate, he does show up in that big, black SUV and he has a team of cooks and all sorts of kitchen equipment. For the bbq show he had about 10 Weber kettle grills going. Now I know he lost that Throwdown but I would have been okay if he had won because the other guy, Butch, was a seasoned bbq pro.

I think it was those first two episodes, the chowder and the wedding cake which really rubbed me the wrong way.

 
At 8:30 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

In the latest episode the judge seemed to know whose pizza was whose before he voted. I'm not expecting a totally fair competition, but at least make an attempt.
P.S. I just learned the other day that "Emeril Live" isn't live. What's up with that?
~ E.E.S.

 
At 10:46 PM, Blogger dbrociner said...

E.E.S., yeah I just saw that pizza episode too. The judge never makes any bones about whose pizza is whose. This was another episode that, I think, proved my point about the show. You have a guy who makes great pizza and you have our man, Bobby Flay, calling him out. In the end Bobby just looks like an arrogant jerk. I don't care if he losses the challenge and holds the other guy's hand up in victory, he looks bad just for showing up at all.

As for Emeril Live not really being live, the show is filmed in front of a live audience. They do prompt the crowd, otherwise how would everyone know to ooh and aah when he uses lots of garlic? Things may not be shown in exactly "real time" but I think it's closer than the "stand and stir" shows that you see on the Food Network which are shot a couple of times and then pieced together for the final product.

Oh, and there's no Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny either. I do still hold out hope however for the Great Pumpkin. :-D

 

Post a Comment

<< Home